As James Kachmar previously wrote on the IP Law Blog, the man who was photographed as a naked baby in 1991 for Nirvana’s iconic “Nevermind” album cover is now suing the band for distributing child pornography. Scott Hervey and James discuss the Ninth Circuit’s opinion on the case in this episode of The Briefing.
Continue Reading The Briefing: Nirvana Stuck in Lawsuit Over “Nevermind” Album Cover
USPTO Issues Guidance on Patentability of Inventions Developed with the Assistance of Artificial Intelligence
On February 12, 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) issued guidance on the patentability of inventions developed with the assistance of artificial intelligence, saying that a human must have made a “significant contribution” to the invention. The USPTO explained that while AI-assisted inventions are not categorically unpatentable, the inventorship analysis should focus on human contributions, as patents function to incentivize and reward human ingenuity. Thus, patent protection may be sought for inventions for which a natural person provided a significant contribution to the invention, and the guidance provides procedures for determining the same.
Continue Reading USPTO Issues Guidance on Patentability of Inventions Developed with the Assistance of Artificial IntelligenceThe Briefing – Brandy Melville v Redbubble: Navigating Contributory Infringement
Brandy Melville has asked the Supreme Court to review the 9th Circuit’s decision in its dispute with Redbubble. Scott Hervey and Jamie Lincenberg discuss this case on this episode of The Briefing.
Watch this episode on the Weintraub YouTube channel here.
The Briefing: Ninth Circuit Pulls Back Rogers Test in Light of Jack Daniels Decision
As Scott Hervey previously wrote on the IP Law Blog, the holding in the Supreme Court case Jack Daniels Properties v. VIP Products limits the applicability of the Rogers test. Scott and Jamie Lincenberg talk about this case on this episode of The Briefing.
Continue Reading The Briefing: Ninth Circuit Pulls Back Rogers Test in Light of Jack Daniels Decision
Ninth Circuit Pulls Back Rogers Test in Light of Jack Daniels Decision
The holding in the Supreme Court case, Jack Daniels Properties v VIP Products, the case of the infringing Bad Spaniels dog toy, limits the applicability of the Rogers test. A recent case in the Ninth Circuit, Punchbowl Inc v. AJ Press, addressed the interplay between the decision in Jack Daniels and the Rogers test.
Continue Reading Ninth Circuit Pulls Back Rogers Test in Light of Jack Daniels Decision